Sorting
Q31.
Choose the correct alternatives (More than one may be correct).The complexity of comparision based sorting algorithms is:Q32.
Give the correct matching for the following pairs: \begin{array}{ll|ll}\hline \text{(A)} & \text{$O (\log n)$} & \text{(P)} & \text{Selection sort} \\\hline \text{(B)} & \text{$O (n)$} & \text{(Q)}& \text{Insertion sort} \\\hline \text{(C)}& \text{$O (n \log n)$} & \text{(R)} & \text{Binary search} \\\hline \text{(D)} & \text{$O (n^2)$} &\text{(S)} & \text{Merge sort} \\\hline \end{array}Q33.
Consider the Quicksort algorithm. Suppose there is a procedure for finding a pivot element which splits the list into two sub-lists each of which contains at least one-fifth of the elements. Let T(n) be the number of comparisons required to sort n elements. ThenQ34.
In quick sort, for sorting n elements, the (n/4)th smallest element is selected as pivot using an O(n) time algorithm. What is the worst case time complexity of the quick sort?Q35.
Which one the following in place sorting algorithms needs the minimum number of swaps?Q38.
The usual \Theta (n^{2}) implementation of Insertion Sort to sort ab array uses linear search to identify the position where an element is to be inserted into the already sorted part of the array. If, instead, we use binary search to identify the position, the worst case running time willQ40.
Quick-sort is run on two inputs shown below to sort in ascending order taking first element as pivot (i). 1, 2, 3, \dots n (ii). n, n-1, n-2, \dots, 2, 1 Let C_1 and C_2 be the number of comparisons made for the inputs (i) and (ii) respectively. Then,